100 Disney Things [005]: Common Criticisms of The Little Mermaid

[chacusha]

100 Disney Things [005]

Oh man, I am getting too busy for these posts. This one's been sitting on my hard drive for a while, and I've only now gotten around to cleaning it up. Basically, it's sort of a rebuttal/examination of the common criticisms that get lobbed at The Little Mermaid, plus my own thoughts on the movie and Ariel as a character. It's an evaluation of The Little Mermaid and Ariel, from a feminist perspective, but hopefully much more in-depth than what you usually see on the Internet or in a media studies class... (And sort of ranty.)



The more I think about The Little Mermaid, the more I feel like it's been somehow criticism-proofed. As in, it's like they knew exactly what people would criticize about the movie over and over again and specifically put in scenes to THWART THAT CRITICISM. Examples:

• As if they knew that people would criticize Ariel for wanting to be a human for love, they put in Ariel's big "I want" song, "Part of Your World," before she even knew Eric existed.

• As if they knew that people would criticize Ariel for leaving her "loving father and sisters" for a man, they put in a traumatic scene where King Triton destroys all of Ariel's most prized possessions in a rage. They also put in a line where Ariel asks Ursula if being a human means she'll never get to see her father or sisters again. "Life's full of tough choices, innit?" is Ursula's response. Ariel weighed it. Her decision wasn't about blindly choosing Eric over family but about making a clean break, deciding to run away from home to a new life -- permanently, if need be. (Admittedly, it was kind of a gamble that Eric would turn out to be an overall good person and also interested in her, and also admittedly it's a little iffy that Ariel's goals of being human and being with Eric become pretty much merged after she saves him from the shipwreck -- that muddles the waters a bit in understanding why Ariel struck the bargain in the first place. But in any case, Ariel only struck the bargain with Ursula after Triton destroyed her grotto. This is important!)

• As if they knew that people would criticize Eric for only liking Ariel for her looks, they put in a whole date montage where Ariel is able to clearly convey her personality through her actions.

• As if they knew that people would complain about Eric heartlessly choosing another girl over Ariel after she made all those sacrifices for him, they put in a scene where he decides to give up on his mystery singing girl in favor of Ariel, only to have Ursula hypnotize him right after. Like, this is the one that strikes me as particularly prescient. Not content with Eric simply encountering a woman with the right voice and that changing his mind, they took extra measures to show that Eric chose Ariel, and then made it so that Ursula only changes his mind by hypnotizing him.

Too bad about 75% of the Internet seems to not remember these scenes.

That isn't to say that there's nothing in this movie that can be criticized, but just that the types of critiques that you hear a lot must be made by people with a fuzzy recollection of the film, since, like... they're dealt with in the film itself.


In more detail, here's how the "problematic storyline" of The Little Mermaid goes:

Ariel's hobby is collecting human artifacts. At the beginning of the film, she skips concert practice to go trawling through a shipwreck looking for interesting items to add to her collection.

She then goes to the surface to consult Scuttle about the unfamiliar objects. She is later scolded by Triton for this because of the danger of merfolk going to the surface. He tells her never to do it again. She doesn't acquiesce, and instead swims off tearfully.

In her secret grotto, she sings about how she longs to be part of the human world. Afterwards, she goes to the surface, sees Eric's ship, and falls in love with him. There's a storm and the ship ends up catching on fire. Eric goes back to the burning ship to save his dog. However, he's flung into the sea where Ariel saves him and brings him to shore.

She sings to him but leaves before he's able to clearly see her face. Here, "Part of Your World" reprises and becomes about wanting to stay with Eric and be part of his world specifically. From this point on, Ariel's desire to be human becomes melded with her desire to be with Eric.

Flounder finds Prince Eric's statue and presents it to Ariel. Triton shows up at the grotto and they argue. Ariel lets slip that she loves Eric. A furious Triton blasts everything in her grotto, leaving a crying Ariel.

Flotsam and Jetsam show up offering Ariel a way to be with Eric. She goes to Ursula who gives her this deal:

She gets: Human form
On the condition that: She gets True Love's Kiss from the Prince before sunset on the third day
Price: Her voice
If she fails to meet condition: She becomes Ursula's property (a polyp)

Ariel accepts. In essence, Ursula is giving her one desire (human body) on the condition that Ariel gets her other desire (Eric's love) to happen too, so she either wins twice or forfeits her freedom in trying to make her own dreams come true. She gives up her voice, which at various points in the movie is described as particularly beautiful (by Sebastian and Eric), so arguably she is giving up her "greatest possession". However, there's no indication that Ariel herself values her singing voice any more than, you know, any person would value their ability to talk. Remember, she skipped music practice earlier to go hunting for human artifacts.

After that, Ariel becomes human and Eric finds her and takes her in, they have dinner together, Ariel is like a kid in a candy store, etc. etc. The next day they go on a ride through the kingdom, Eric starts to fall for her, and they almost kiss, but Ursula sabotages it. That night, Eric decides to stop mooning after the Mystery Voice Girl. Ironically, Mystery Voice Girl shows up but it's Ursula and actually she's hypnotizing him.

The next day, their marriage is announced and Ariel's heart is broken. Upon hearing that Vanessa is Ursula, though, she decides to not give up. Scuttle breaks Ursula's shell, Ariel's voice returns to her, Eric breaks free from the spell, and they almost kiss again, but time runs out, so Ursula takes mermaid Ariel back into the ocean where Triton shows up and trades his life for Ariel's. Eric shows up and eventually kills Ursula.

Triton, finally understanding his daughter's feelings, turns her human again.

The important thing to note here is that The Little Mermaid, unlike Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, Pocahontas, etc. is not a love story about Ariel and Eric. It's a coming-of-age story about Ariel and Triton. It's about their loving but rocky relationship and how Triton eventually comes to understand his daughter and realize that she's grown up while he wasn't looking, and to let her go in the end.


The whole movie builds up to this moment -- when Ariel says, "I love you, Daddy."

Ariel's turning human is partly about making her dreams come true, partly about finding love, but also partly an act that can only really be compared to "running away from home." If The Little Mermaid took place in modern times, the climax of the first act of the movie would essentially be Ariel getting into a huge row with her father, him throwing a tantrum and trashing her room, and then her deciding she absolutely does not want to stay there anymore and running away. (To "Auntie Ursula" who promises her the dream life in the Big City, everything Ariel wanted! Except it comes with a catch. ...This would make an awesome AU.)

I think there is valid criticism in having the motivation and goals for Ariel's actions be men on both ends -- her motivation for leaving comes from her father, and her objective once she becomes human is related to Eric. However, this doesn't seem particularly horrible other than just the lack of female presence in the storyline. Also, I think there is valid criticism in that she ends up more dependent and passive after becoming human. For example:

• The condition of the spell means everything hinges on Eric's actions -- she is therefore reliant on him.

• When the wedding is going down, the animals (Sebastian, Flounder, Scuttle, and Max) are the ones who take all the action. What bugs me about this part is that Ariel can't even swim anymore. She jumps into the water to get to Eric but needs to hold onto a barrel to float and needs Flounder to pull her through the water. She doesn't even kick her legs or anything, a complete reversal from when she was a mermaid. I suppose you could argue that maybe she only knows how to use a tail to swim and can't figure out how to make human legs move the same way. Or that this was an intentional creative choice to contrast Ariel's mermaid world/body/skills she sacrificed with the human world/body/skills she received in exchange. Still, I do not particularly like this creative decision, since it's such a reversal from Ariel's active and physically-oriented personality shown in the first scene, and I don't think it would have hurt the movie very much to at least show her kicking.

• She ends up being saved by Eric in the final scene, a reversal from earlier when she saved him. Not really bad by itself (I mean, it's not like you're not allowed to be saved by anyone ever or you're a Bad Female Role Model OMG!!), but these three things together do show a progression from Ariel going from a very active state at the beginning of the movie to becoming noticeably more passive by the end.

Another valid criticism for this movie is that Ariel falls in love instantly, and True Love is achieved in about 1.5 days. However, this isn't exactly uncommon in Disney movies... or just movies in general, which tend to be very fast-paced/condensed when it comes to romance, and plot in general.

There is also semi-valid criticism in that Ariel is silenced during the latter half of the movie. I don't think there's a negative message in here, though, like, "Women should or have to give up their right to speak in order to get a man!" or "Hey, Ariel had a happy ending by giving up her voice so you should do that too!" I can see how the loss of her voice would make people uncomfortable, because she loses her ability to express her thoughts, communicate, protest, make a scene, etc. And combined with my earlier critique that Act II!Ariel is more passive than Act I!Ariel, it might remind people uncomfortably of cultural expectations that women be quiet and passive (lampshaded by Ursula's lines during "Poor Unfortunate Souls" -- "Yet on land it's much preferred for ladies not to say a word [...] But they dote and swoon and fawn / on a lady who's withdrawn / It's she who holds her tongue who gets a man"). But I think it's inaccurate to say the movie is implying that that's right or the way things should be. Sure, Ariel does lose her voice and ends up getting the prince, but it's portrayed in the movie as a disadvantage/challenge Ursula set up, NOT a positive thing that helps Ariel find love. In essence, the way I view Ariel's sacrifice is that it's sort of... Faustian? Not sure what the right word to use is. But she's basically playing a high-stakes gambling game with a devil who will use tricks to make sure she never wins.

My final critique is that I do think Ariel's body shape is sort of problematic. While it's not unusual for a cartoon character to have a tiny waist compared to their head (because cartoon characters tend to have big heads and be pretty stylized), the way Ariel's waist narrows is just... not realistic. In order to do that, you either need clothing that shapes your waist such as a corset (which Ariel doesn't have as a mermaid) or you need to be constantly sucking in your waist (which is just a silly thing to do). My minor nitpick.

So to sum up my thoughts on The Little Mermaid and critiques I read of The Little Mermaid... I generally get frustrated by critiques of this movie because I think what a lot of them miss is that, when Ariel makes her deal with Ursula, while she is doing it to get a man, even more important than that, she is doing it for her own chance at happiness. Women taking risks or making mistakes while striving to achieve personal happiness -- I'm not quite sure how this is a "bad message"? If the main character were male, we'd view them as a brave, heroic figure who made sacrifices for their dream, and those sacrifices paid off.

As for my evaluation of Ariel, I find her to be one of Disney's strongest heroines in the sense that overall she is a very active character -- this is undoubtedly her story, and her desires and her actions take center stage. I also think she's pretty interesting because she's meant to be largely sympathetic, but she has her share of real flaws as well (impulsiveness, rebelliousness, etc.). I find real flaws like this much more compelling than faux flaws like being clumsy or being an outcast or being ugly-but-sekritly-beautiful or whatnot. I had trouble digging Ariel when I was younger because I didn't relate to her at all (since I never had a rebellious phase and I get along with my parents pretty well), but now that I'm older I kind of appreciate the fact that she IS different from me, with different circumstances, and a different personality. It makes it more interesting to try to understand and empathize with her.


EDIT: Lol, I just saw a link to this on Tumblr. While yes I agree Ariel's actions screwed other people over, this sentence is the epitome of everything I hate about TLM analysis: "She gives up her whole life, the one thing that makes her really special (her voice), her family, her friends, everything she knows, just so she can be with Eric. She changes her species for a guy she’s never even met!" NO. STOP.

Also, regarding trusting Ursula, I should note that if Ariel and Triton hadn't been so strained in their relationship, Triton could very easily and painlessly have given her a human body (this is, after all, what he does at the end of the movie). But convinced she had a snowball's chance of convincing her dad to do that, she turned to the only other person who apparently had the ability to do it. You can view it as a metaphor of sorts that if you outright ban someone from doing something that they really really want to do, most likely they will end up doing it behind your back anyway and in a more dangerous way than if you had just allowed the possibility.

---

You can suggest topics for future posts for this meme over here.

Comments

[grimoire.livejournal.com]

I really don't like the movie so I didn't expect to agree with your points (I mean.. I just really dislike almost everything about it) but you make a lot of sense and made me see some things from a different perspective. I never disliked the movie, or Ariel herself for reasons you mentioned. I did think it was a little... weird for her to fall so fast for him and all but I will talk about it a bit later. Anyways, it's an old Disney movies, it's mostly aimed at kids. I think that disliking her solely because she picked a guy over her family and such is a bit unfair for many reasons? Especially considering she was a teenager who wasn't mature to begin with. First of all, back then the whole "strong woman" concept wasn't as popular as it is these days and it's obvious people make things that will sell. I don't know how popular, loved or hated the movie was years ago but seeing as older princesses aren't as independent as the ones that appeared a little later makes me think it just wasn't a popular concept or something people would "buy"? I might be wrong though. I still remember that people from my environment often disliked the females that are considered "strong" by many people these days et all. It might be just people around me who were like that but... Then again, there are many ways to be a strong person and it doesn't always mean you can't depend on anyone/have to be independent or whatever falls into the "strong woman" category these days because I don't know anymore. I feel mostly independent and aggressive characters fall into that stereotype and half of the time I don't even agree. I would go on but I think I would start talking about a completely different thing. (I assume they mean that she needs to be strong instead of giving up everything for a guy because zomg, we are feminists).

Though, isn't every early Disney Princess suffering the same fate? All I ever read about Snow White, Cinderella, Aurora is how they were dependent on men and things that fall into similar categories. It's a pet peeve of mine and I don't even like any of them aside of Aurora? Yet people forget it's old movies and the girls were romantic. They're not going to be all "I don't need a Prince! I can be abused like that till I die instead" (in Cinderella's case). Sure, she could try doing something about it without having the Prince save her but 1) it's a fairy tale 2) not every woman, or person is confident or independent enough to change their situation. So, while I can easily understand dislike towards all of the princesses, I don't like the whole bashing based only on how dependent they were or that they needed to be saved by a guy. I think I am all over the place, orz. All in all, the heroines are supposed to be different because it makes it easier for people to relate to at least one of them and we don't get stories that are the same. Now that I ranted enough, back to Ariel.

[grimoire.livejournal.com]

I will refrain from saying my overall opinion on Ariel (I actually agree more or less with Vanja on most things) but here is something I wanted to add to your discussion in the first thread. I don't think Ariel's actions can be explain with logic at all because that is something this girl lacks. In fact, to me her actions make sense which is actually why I dislike her. As in, to me Ariel is very naive and child-like so many of her actions just seem kind of normal for her personality? Complete opposite of what I think she would do, sure, but her personality is also completely different so while I don't like her, I would defend her when it comes to certain parts of the movie. Like, for example, her falling for Eric. With her fascination over the human world and humans themselves, not wanting to be a mermaid, and with her attitude towards things, impulsiveness and emotional personality... i wouldn't say it's very wrong or for her to be interested in him. I do think that calling it love is a bit too much as I would say it's just fascination but it's a disney movie after all. Of course, I would facepalm at someone like that in real life but not liking someone's actions isn't the same as not understanding them. I do think signing the contract and all just to escape her family was far too reckless but then again, I wouldn't say she is a rebel without a cause in this situation either. While I do think Triton cared a lot for her, he didn't show it... well and she was just a teenager, it's obvious she'd overreact. She didn't have it very tough, I agree here with Vanja but at the same time we see a movie and the characters how they are. As in, Triton was tough and often treated Ariel in a bit harsher way than needed from what I remember but we see scenes where he is truly concerned without crashing things. If you think about it, from her point of view it was hard to notice he actually means well. Granted, I say I understand but I still think she was being selfish nevertheless and bratty. As in, as said, she didn't have it tough so an argue once in a while... who doesn't go through that? She even had many sisters, I am sure she could depend on some of them so it's not like she was alone. Many people have it tougher without having the chance to "escape" in any reasonable way so I can't find Ariel's characters very... appealing as she just escaped what she didn't like, though I do agree that at least she tried to fight for what she wants. Back to the whole Triton/Ariel thing and defending the girl. She cared about the human world and it meant a lot for her, maybe a bit more than needed and he kept being against it and since she lacked knowledge on many things, she couldn't understand why. She didn't know if he was right or not because yet again, she is naive and not experienced. To know things, you have to go through them usually or you just won't know if others were right, and even after one time you might not learn from your mistake. Now that I have been re-thinking about the movie, I think I just can relate a bit to her situation from Triton's perspective with my sister. Some people are just bad at being "nice" and "supportive", and apparently it's hard to see beneath the cold exterior which is exactly what Ariel didn't see. While I usually hate the characters who go rebellious just because they got emotional, I think Triton acted in a manner that was too harsh for Ariel to stand/understand (in short, I don't think Ariel had personality strong enough to handle Triton). Not to mention he acted in a very aggressive way, shouting and using violence. As I said above, it would be weird if she wasn't influenced at all, and being someone reckless she did a reckless thing on impulse. I know that even when I don't care about someone and they act towards me in similar manner, I won't always act as collected as I usually do. Not that I get emotional but for someone emotional like Ariel, her reaction in this situation is understandable, even if stupid. If he just scolded her and she acted like that? Sure, that would be bratty but aggression and violence has a bit more influence on people?

Okay I hope I made sense, it took me so much time to put all my thoughts together that I am not sure anymore.

[chacusha]

Yep I agree, the "strong woman" concept is pretty poorly defined, especially when "strong women" is used to refer to a subset of personalities or used only to refer to certain goals people consider acceptable. So... some personalities are "strong" and others are "weak"? That doesn't make sense.

And yeah, I think it's fair to criticize the princesses as a group, but when people start arguing "Princess X is such a bad role model because she relied on her Prince to save her or she didn't stand up to Person Y" then the argument starts not making sense because like... there's nothing intrinsically WRONG with any of that. There's only an issue when you see the same thing over and over again.

And yep, I think that's the core of it -- I don't think I would take the same actions Ariel did, but at the same time, it makes sense that she would react that way, and I find her character interesting.

To know things, you have to go through them usually or you just won't know if others were right, and even after one time you might not learn from your mistake.
THE TRUTH.

And yeah, I think Triton had the best intentions but his actions were really harsh, and I don't blame Ariel for reacting so badly to them, but I don't really blame Triton for flipping out either. You can see that from each of their point of views they were doing what they thought was right, but they just had difficulty understanding each other.